翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ British Association of International Mountain Leaders ・ British Association of Mountain Guides ・ British Association of Nature Conservationists ・ British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons ・ British Airways Flight 2069 ・ British Airways Flight 2276 ・ British Airways Flight 268 ・ British Airways Flight 38 ・ British Airways Flight 5390 ・ British Airways Flight 9 ・ British Airways franchise destinations ・ British Airways Helicopters ・ British Airways Ltd (1935–39) ・ British Airways Ltd (2012–15) ・ British Airways Maintenance Cardiff ・ British Airways plc v Williams ・ British Airways World Cargo ・ British Alpine goat ・ British Alpine Hannibal Expedition ・ British Aluminium ・ British Amateur Press Association ・ British Amateur Press Association (comics) ・ British Amateur Rugby League Association ・ British Amateur Television Club ・ British Ambassador's residence in Washington, D.C. ・ British America ・ British American Drama Academy ・ British American Football Association ・ British American Football League ・ British American Football Referees' Association Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク British Airways plc v Williams ： ウィキペディア英語版 British Airways plc v Williams ''British Airways plc v Williams'' (2011) (C-155/10 ) is a UK labour law and EU law decision by the European Court of Justice regarding the right to holidays with pay, which is found in the Universal Declaration on Human Rights article 24, the Working Time Directive and the Working Time Regulations 1998. ''Williams'' itself was decided under analogous rules found in the Civil Aviation (Working Time) Regulations 2004. It held that variable components in pay, such as bonuses, must be included in the amount of pay people receive while they are on holiday. ==Facts== Williams, and other pilots who worked for British Airways claimed that their holiday pay was too low, because it only reflected his fixed salary, and not his bonuses. Williams' comprised a fixed annual salary, a "flying pay supplement" that went up the more he flew, and a "time away from base" which went up the more he was away from home. The flying and time away allowances were capped. Properly construed, his contract suggested that his holiday pay would be at the rate of only his fixed salary. Williams, however, contended that this was contrary to the Civil Aviation Working Time Directive, as implemented by the ''Civil Aviation (Working Time) Regulations 2004'', (sector-specific implementations with the same objective as the Working Time Directive and the Working Time Regulations 1998 in this respect). In absence of particular provisions, the pay while on leave should be "normal remuneration". British Airways contended that because the Employment Rights Act 1996 sections 221 to 224 did not have provisions on how to determine a week's pay, the rate should be determined with reference to the contract. Under the Civil Aviation (Working Time) Regulations 2004, which enacted the European directive 2000/79/EC, airline crew are entitled to a minimum of four weeks 'paid annual leave'. Under UK law, this meant that airline crew were in general entitled to 'normal or comparable pay' whilst on leave. BA crew were paid a basic fixed wage, but they also received additional payment in the form of a 'Flying Pay Supplement' and a 'Time Away from Base Allowance'. During periods of statutory leave, staff, including the appellants, were paid according to their basic wage, without any allowance for time that they would have spent flying, or away from base, had they been working according to their usual patterns. A case was brought in the Employment Tribunals by approximately 2,750 BA pilots, who argued that the 'normal pay' condition under UK law meant that BA were obliged to pay them as though they had spent time away from base and on flights during their annual leave. Their claim was successful in both the Employment Tribunal and Employment Appeals Tribunal. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「British Airways plc v Williams」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.